Disadvantages of Partial Knee Replacement

Blog

Introduction

Partial knee replacement (also known as unicompartmental knee replacement) has gained popularity in the UK as a less invasive alternative to total knee replacement for patients with arthritis limited to one compartment of the knee. While this procedure offers several potential advantages—including quicker recovery, bone preservation, and more natural knee movement—it also comes with specific disadvantages that patients should carefully consider when making treatment decisions.

For suitable candidates, partial knee replacement can provide excellent outcomes, but understanding both the benefits and limitations is essential for making an informed choice. This guide examines the potential disadvantages of partial knee replacement, helping you weigh these factors against the procedure's advantages when discussing options with your healthcare providers.

Limited Candidacy: Not an Option for Everyone

One of the primary disadvantages is that many patients simply aren't suitable candidates:

Strict Selection Criteria

Partial knee replacement is limited to patients with:

Arthritis confined to a single compartment (usually the inner/medial side)
Intact ligaments, particularly the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
Limited deformity (minimal bow-legged or knock-kneed alignment)
Reasonable range of motion
No significant inflammatory arthritis

Exclusion of Many Arthritis Patients

These restrictions mean:

Only 20-30% of knee arthritis patients meet the criteria
Many patients discover they're unsuitable only after consultation
Advanced imaging may be needed to confirm eligibility
Some borderline cases face difficult decisions about which procedure to choose

Higher Revision Rate: The Risk of Additional Surgery

Perhaps the most significant disadvantage is the increased likelihood of needing revision surgery:

Statistical Reality

Data from joint registries show:

Higher revision rates compared to total knee replacement
UK National Joint Registry: Approximately 2.5 times higher revision rate at 10 years
Australian registry: Similar findings with higher cumulative revision rates
Particularly higher revision rates in younger, more active patients

Reasons for Revision

Common causes for revisions include:

Progression of arthritis in the other compartments
Implant loosening
Bearing dislocation (in mobile-bearing designs)
Persistent unexplained pain
Technical issues with implant positioning

Technical Challenges: Precision and Placement Issues

The procedure presents specific technical challenges:

Demanding Surgical Technique

Partial knee replacement requires:

More precise implant positioning
Less room for error than total replacement
Challenging soft tissue balancing
Potential for subtle alignment issues

Variation in Surgical Experience

Outcomes can be affected by:

Surgeon volume and specialisation
Learning curve for the procedure
Centre-specific expertise and protocols
Availability of specialized instruments or navigation

Disease Progression: The Arthritis Can Spread

A significant concern is the potential for arthritis to develop in previously healthy areas:

Natural Disease Evolution

Over time, many patients experience:

Development of arthritis in other knee compartments
Gradual deterioration of initially healthy cartilage
Changes in biomechanics that may accelerate wear elsewhere
Progression of early, previously undetected damage

Unpredictable Timeframes

The progression varies significantly:

Some patients experience problems within 2-5 years
Others maintain good function for 15+ years
Difficulty predicting which patients will experience progression
Younger patients generally at higher risk for eventual progression

Potential for Unsatisfactory Results: The Grey Zone

Some patients fall into a category of neither complete success nor clear failure:

Persistent Symptoms

A subset of patients experience:

Ongoing discomfort despite technically successful surgery
Functional limitations that weren't anticipated
Activity restrictions that may be more limiting than expected
Mechanical symptoms that are difficult to diagnose and address

Expectation Challenges

Issues related to patient expectations include:

Higher expectations due to the "less invasive" description
Anticipated quicker recovery that may not materialise for everyone
Expectations of completely normal knee function that may be unrealistic
Difficulty accepting limitations when the procedure was chosen specifically for better function

Conversion Challenges: If Revision Becomes Necessary

When revision to a total knee replacement becomes necessary, additional challenges arise:

Technical Complexity of Revision

Converting to a total knee replacement can involve:

More extensive surgery than a primary total replacement
Potential need for bone grafting due to bone loss
Possible requirement for more constrained implant designs
Longer operating time and recovery period

Outcome Considerations

Results after conversion may be affected by:

Generally good but slightly inferior outcomes compared to primary total replacement
Potential for more complicated recovery
Increased risk of complications during the revision procedure
Higher costs to the healthcare system

Specific Implant Considerations: Design Limitations

Different partial knee replacement systems have their own disadvantages:

Fixed vs. Mobile Bearing Designs

Trade-offs between designs include:

Fixed bearing: Simpler but potentially higher wear rates
Mobile bearing: Potentially lower wear but risks of bearing dislocation
Variation in thickness options and anatomic conformity
Different learning curves for surgeons

Cemented vs. Cementless Fixation

Fixation method considerations:

Cemented designs: Potential for cement debris and interface loosening
Cementless designs: Risk of inadequate initial fixation
Long-term questions about durability of fixation
Age-related bone quality concerns affecting fixation choice

Less Predictable Pain Relief: Uncertain Outcomes

Pain resolution can be less predictable than with total knee replacement:

Variable Pain Patterns

Some patients experience:

Unexplained pain despite good implant positioning
Pain from undiagnosed pathology in other compartments
Referred pain from other sources (hip, spine)
Persistent soft tissue discomfort around the partial replacement

Diagnostic Challenges

When pain persists, challenges include:

Difficulty determining the exact pain source
Limited options for addressing pain without conversion
Uncertainty about whether revision would resolve the pain
Complex decision-making about next steps

Psychological and Decision-Making Impact

The possibility of needing future surgery creates specific psychological challenges:

Anxiety About Future Surgery

Many patients experience:

Concern about whether they've made the right choice
Anxiety with any new knee symptoms
Worry about the potential need for revision
Stress regarding the timing of potential revision

Complex Decision Pathway

The decision-making process includes:

More complex informed consent discussions
Weighing present benefits against future risks
Individual risk tolerance considerations
Age and activity level factoring heavily into decisions

Common Questions About Partial Knee Replacement Disadvantages

The decision between partial and total knee replacement should consider several factors beyond just the location of arthritis. While isolated single-compartment arthritis is the primary criterion for partial replacement, other factors include: 1) your age and activity level (younger, more active patients have higher revision rates with partials), 2) weight (higher BMI may increase complications with partial replacements), 3) extent of deformity (significant bow-legged or knock-kneed alignment may preclude partials), and 4) your personal preference regarding the trade-off between potentially quicker recovery versus higher long-term revision risk. Appropriate evaluation typically includes: detailed physical examination, standing X-rays, sometimes an MRI, and occasionally arthroscopy in borderline cases. Seeking opinions from surgeons who regularly perform both procedures can provide balanced perspective on which option better suits your specific situation.

According to the UK National Joint Registry, partial knee replacements have approximately 2.5 times higher revision rates at 10 years compared to total knee replacements. Specifically, the data shows that while approximately 4-5% of total knee replacements require revision within 10 years, that figure rises to 10-12% for partial replacements. This difference is even more pronounced in younger patients (under 60 years). However, these statistics should be interpreted in context—many partial knee replacements perform excellently for 15+ years, and when revision is required, it's often less complex than revising a total knee replacement. Additionally, surgeon experience significantly affects outcomes, with high-volume partial knee replacement surgeons achieving better results and lower revision rates than the average reported in registries.

If arthritis progresses to other compartments of your knee after partial knee replacement, several scenarios might unfold: If the symptoms are mild or manageable, continued non-surgical treatment may be appropriate For significant symptoms affecting quality of life, conversion to a total knee replacement is typically recommended In rare cases, a second partial replacement in another compartment might be considered (though this is controversial) The conversion to a total knee replacement after a failed partial generally has good outcomes, though slightly less favorable than a primary total knee replacement. The procedure is more complex than a primary replacement but usually less complicated than revising a failed total knee replacement. Recovery from this conversion surgery typically follows similar patterns to primary total knee replacement, though sometimes with slightly longer rehabilitation periods.

While you can't completely eliminate the inherent disadvantages of partial knee replacement, several strategies can help minimize risks: Choose a surgeon with significant experience specifically in partial knee replacement (aim for those who perform at least 20+ cases annually) Ensure proper patient selection through comprehensive evaluation (appropriate imaging and thorough clinical assessment) Maintain realistic expectations about outcomes and the possible need for future surgery Follow activity guidelines and avoid high-impact activities that might accelerate wear Maintain healthy weight to reduce stress on the implant Attend regular follow-up appointments to monitor implant performance and detect any issues early These approaches won't eliminate the possibility of needing revision surgery or experiencing other disadvantages, but they can help maximize your chances of a successful long-term outcome with a partial knee replacement.

Conclusion

Partial knee replacement offers significant potential advantages for appropriate candidates, including less surgical trauma, quicker recovery, and more natural knee kinematics. However, these benefits come with important trade-offs that must be carefully considered.

The primary disadvantages—higher revision rates, strict candidacy requirements, potential for disease progression, and technical challenges—don't mean that partial knee replacement is a poor choice. Rather, they highlight the importance of individualized decision-making that weighs these factors against the procedure's benefits for your specific situation.

The ideal approach involves detailed discussion with orthopaedic specialists who perform both partial and total knee replacements regularly, careful consideration of your activity goals and risk tolerance, and realistic expectations about both short and long-term outcomes.

If you're considering knee replacement surgery and want to explore whether partial knee replacement might be appropriate despite its disadvantages, our healthcare provider marketplace can connect you with experienced orthopaedic surgeons who can provide personalized assessment and guidance tailored to your specific knee condition and circumstances.